Monthly Archives: November 2011

Second Circuit Affirms District of Columbia Refusal To Dismiss Case Against Afghanistan Under Noncommercial Tort Exception To FSIA; Case Remanded to S.D.N.Y. for Jurisdictional Discovery

Doe v. Bin Laden, Islamic Emirate of Afganistan, et al., No. 09-4958-cv (2d Cir. Nov. 2011) (per curiam), affirmed a District Court in the District of Columbia’s decision to permit a case to proceed against Afghanistan, rejecting the argument that … Continue reading

Posted in Adjudication, International Practice | Tagged , | Comments Off

FSIA Immunity Found In Suit Against Germany; Neither Commericial Activity Nor Takings Exceptions Applies To Real Property Located in Germany.

Hammerstein v. The Federal Republic of Germany, 09-CV-443 (ARR)(RLM) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 2011), dismisses for want of subject matter jurisdiction claims asserted against Germany.   Plaintiff fought over the right to own the property located in Germany, ultimately won that fight against … Continue reading

Posted in Adjudication, International Practice | Tagged , | Comments Off

Courts Continue To Resist Confidentiality in Filing Arbitral Vacatur/Confirmation Proceedings; Other Rulings Lead To Confirmation of Award

Harper Ins. Ltd. v. Century Indemnity Co., 10 Civ. 7866 (S.D.N.Y. July 2011)(NRB), addersses cross-petitions to vacate and confirm an arbitral award.  The case addresses several typical issues arising in such proceedings but also others of note to topics we … Continue reading

Posted in Adjudication, Arbitration, International Practice | Tagged | Comments Off

Post-Arbitral Award Proceeding To Pierce Corporate Veil Correct Procedure But Fails on the Merits

Ahcom, Ltd. v. Hendrik Smelding, et al., Case No. 07-1139 SC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2011), presents two interesting issues for international litigation and dispute resolution.   Nuttery Farms, Inc., a U.S. corporation, defaulted in connection with a series of contracts for the … Continue reading

Posted in Adjudication, Arbitration, International Practice | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Waiver of Privilege and Crime Fraud Exception At Play in International Litigation over Ecuadorian Judgment Against Chevron

The most recent installment in the U.S. proceedings in which Chevron is trying to avoid the $8 billion judgment entered against it in an Ecuadorian court (which we have posted on many times) takes the form of a decision by … Continue reading

Posted in Adjudication, International Practice | Tagged , | Comments Off

Ninth Circuit Denies Rehearing in Bauman v. DaimlerChrysler, Finding Personal Jurisdiction by Imputation and Watering Down “Agency” Test for Finding Jurisdiction, Say Eight Circuit Judges Who Would Grant Rehearing En Banc

Bauman, et al. v. DaimlerChrysler, et al., No. 07-15386 (9th Cir. 18 May 2011), involves claims by 22 Argentinian residents against DaimlerChrysler Aktiengesellschaft (DCAG) and its Argentinian subsidiary alleging that Mercedes Benz (owned by DaimlerChrysler) collaborated with Argentine state security … Continue reading

Posted in Adjudication, International Practice | Tagged , | Comments Off

Reversal of District Court Grant of Summary Judgment in Favor of the Palestinian Authority Prompts Four Separate Opinions in the D.C. Circuit

Estate of Mark Parsons, et al. v. Palestinian Authority, et al., No. 10-7085 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 2011), reverses the District Court’s grant of summary judgment and finds triable issues of fact.  The decision is relevant to general international litigation issues … Continue reading

Posted in Adjudication, International Practice | Tagged | Comments Off

As More “Confidential” International Arbitral Awards Made Public, the Pracitioner’s Need To Consider Alternatives Increases

We recently posted on the peril to the intended confidentiality accorded the arbitration of international disputes by the necessity of having to file in open court arbitral awards in order to enforce or challenge them.  The issue can be addressed … Continue reading

Posted in Adjudication, Arbitration, International Practice | Tagged | Comments Off

Court Appoints Neutral Expert On Choice of Law Issues But Rejects Public International Law Concepts’ Applicability To Private Claims

A recent decision, Pallano v. AES Corp., C.A. No. 9C-11-021 JRJ (Del. Super. Ct. July 2011), addresses three issues that frequently face the litigation practicioner or corporate draftmen in internaional litigation:  choice of law; the use of experts for the determination … Continue reading

Posted in Adjudication, International Practice | Tagged , | Comments Off

Supreme Court Agrees To Resolve Deep Circuit Split and Decide If Alient Tort Statute Permits Actions Against Corporations

We have followed the development of federal Circuit law on whether the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1350, and specifically the Torture Victim Protection Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1350 note § 2(a), create rights of action against corporations.   The Supreme … Continue reading

Posted in Adjudication, International Practice | Tagged , | Comments Off